The Problem: Mistaking a Plan for a Strategy

IBM's definition—and most corporate AI content—treats strategy as a roadmap. But a roadmap is the output of a strategy, not the strategy itself.

A plan tells you what to do and when. A strategy explains why you're doing it—and how you'll win.

A company might plan to deploy generative AI for customer support or predictive maintenance. But the strategy—the real strategy—defines the leverage point:

"We will use AI to shift from reactive decision-making to adaptive, self-optimizing systems, reducing latency between data and action."

That statement has intent, not tasks. Direction, not milestones.

Without that layer of reasoning, every plan is just a list of activities with no strategic coherence. This is why 95% of AI initiatives fail—they have detailed plans but no strategic foundation.

Vision, Strategy, Plan — The Correct Hierarchy

Understanding the difference between strategy and plan requires clarity on all three layers of strategic thinking:

1. Vision – The Desired Future State

Your vision describes the transformation you're pursuing. It's aspirational and directional.

Example: "AI augments every critical decision across our organization, enabling us to respond to market changes faster than any competitor."

2. Strategy – Your Unique Approach

Your AI strategy defines how you'll achieve that vision in a way that creates competitive advantage. It's about positioning and differentiation.

Example: "Build a modular foundation model around our proprietary customer data and partner ecosystems, creating insights competitors can't replicate."

3. Plan / Roadmap – The Operational Execution

Your plan is the sequence of actions and milestones that operationalize your strategy.

Example: "Phase 1: Data infrastructure consolidation (Q1-Q2) → Phase 2: Pilot models with key customers (Q3) → Phase 3: Integration across business units (Q4) → Phase 4: Scaling and optimization (Year 2)."

IBM's article jumps straight to step 3—building roadmaps, assessing data, defining partners. That's good practice, but it's not strategy. It's tactics in search of direction.

As I explain in What Is an AI Strategy?, these three layers must work hierarchically. Vision informs strategy. Strategy shapes plans. Skip the middle layer, and you're building without knowing why.

Why This Distinction Matters

Confusing AI implementation plans with AI strategy leads to predictable failures:

Misalignment: Teams execute efficiently in the wrong direction. Everyone's busy implementing AI tools, but no one can explain how they advance competitive positioning.

Over-automation: AI gets applied for the sake of AI, not transformation. Companies automate processes that don't create competitive advantage, wasting resources on efficiency gains competitors can easily match.

Lost differentiation: Every competitor follows the same "best practices" list from consulting firms. Without strategic thinking, everyone builds the same AI capabilities and competes on execution speed rather than unique positioning.

Resource waste: Without strategic filters, companies fund dozens of AI pilots that don't connect to business value. The MIT research showing 95% failure rates traces directly back to this problem.

True AI strategy doesn't start with "how to adopt AI." It starts with why AI matters to your specific competitive advantage—the strategic logic behind your AI investments.

Real-World Example: Strategy vs. Plan in Practice

Consider two companies implementing AI for supply chain optimization:

Company A (Plan-Driven):

• Implements AI demand forecasting
• Automates inventory management
• Deploys predictive maintenance
• Measures: cost reduction, efficiency gains

This is a comprehensive plan. But where's the strategy? Why these specific initiatives? How do they create competitive advantage?

Company B (Strategy-Driven):

• Vision: "Become the most responsive supplier in our industry"
• Strategy: "Use AI to compress decision-to-delivery time while maintaining premium quality, creating service levels competitors can't match"
• Plan: Implement AI demand forecasting → Real-time inventory optimization → Dynamic routing → Customer-specific delivery predictions

Company B's plan flows from strategy. Each initiative connects to competitive positioning. The AI investments compound toward a clear strategic goal.

As I detailed in The 4 Pillars of AI Strategy, the best AI strategies use vision and strategic positioning as filters—eliminating initiatives that don't advance competitive advantage, regardless of their technical merit.

A Better Way to Think About AI Strategy

A real AI business strategy is not about integrating AI—it's about redefining how your organization learns, adapts, and competes. It should answer questions like:

• Competitive Advantage: What unique advantage will AI amplify for us that competitors can't easily replicate?
• Value Chain Transformation: How will AI change our value chain, not just our workflows?
• Future Capabilities: What capabilities must we build now to stay relevant three years from now?
• Strategic Trade-offs: What AI opportunities will we explicitly reject because they don't support our positioning?

Only after these strategic questions are answered should you design the plan—the roadmap, data strategy, and vendor selection.

As I argued in What Makes a Good AI Strategy:

"A good AI strategy defines the shift in organizational capability and competitive positioning, not the sequence of tools to implement."

That's the gap in IBM's narrative—and in much of the industry's thinking.

How to Identify If You Have a Strategy or Just a Plan

Test your current "AI strategy" with these questions:

Strategy Indicators:

• Can you explain in one sentence how AI will create competitive advantage?
• Does your approach differentiate you from competitors, or could anyone implement it?
• Are you saying no to AI opportunities that don't fit your strategic positioning?
• Can you articulate what capabilities will be unique to your organization?

Plan Indicators (Red Flags):

• Your "strategy" is a list of AI tools to implement
• Success metrics focus only on efficiency, not competitive positioning
• The document could apply to any company in your industry
• You're implementing AI because competitors are, not because of strategic logic

If your document has more plan indicators than strategy indicators, you have a detailed implementation roadmap, not a strategy.

The Strategic Hierarchy in Action

Let's walk through how the vision-strategy-plan hierarchy actually works:

Vision Level: "Transform from a reactive service provider to a proactive strategic partner that anticipates client needs."

This vision eliminates certain directions (cost-cutting automation, commodity services) and enables others (predictive analytics, advisory capabilities).

Strategy Level: "Use AI to analyze client behavior patterns and industry signals, enabling us to surface strategic opportunities before clients recognize them themselves."

This strategy makes hard choices—it's about insight generation, not efficiency. It focuses on client relationships, not internal processes. It creates switching costs through unique insights.

Plan Level:

1. Build client data integration platform (3 months)
2. Develop industry signal monitoring system (2 months)
3. Create insight generation models trained on client outcomes (4 months)
4. Pilot with top 20 clients (3 months)
5. Scale across client base (6 months)

Notice how the plan flows naturally from strategy, which flows from vision. Each level informs the next. Remove the strategic layer, and the plan becomes a disconnected list of AI projects.

Why Even Big Players Get This Wrong

IBM isn't alone in conflating strategy with planning. Most AI strategy consulting content makes the same mistake because:

Plans are easier to sell: Executives want actionable steps, not strategic frameworks. Consulting firms deliver what clients ask for, even when it's not what they need.

Planning looks productive: A detailed roadmap with milestones feels like progress. Strategic thinking feels abstract and uncertain.

Strategy requires difficult choices: Real strategy means saying no to opportunities, which makes stakeholders uncomfortable. Plans let everyone get what they want.

But this approach is why 95% of AI initiatives fail. Companies execute detailed plans efficiently in strategically wrong directions.

The Bottom Line

IBM isn't wrong about the importance of AI strategy—they're wrong about its definition. And that confusion ripples through boardrooms everywhere.

Plans execute. Strategies decide what's worth executing. Vision inspires why it matters in the first place.

If your "AI strategy" reads like a project plan with milestones and deliverables but no competitive logic, you don't have a strategy—you have a to-do list.

The companies succeeding with AI aren't the ones with the most detailed roadmaps. They're the ones with clear strategic positioning that uses AI to strengthen competitive advantages in ways competitors can't easily replicate.

Your AI strategy should make hard choices about where to compete and how to win. Everything else is just planning.

Ready to Build an AI Strategy That Goes Beyond Buzzwords?

Most companies have detailed AI implementation plans. What they're missing is the strategic foundation that makes those plans worth executing.

I help established companies develop comprehensive AI strategies that create competitive advantage—before they spend a dollar on implementation.

👉 Want to ensure your AI initiatives are built on solid strategic foundations?

Explore AI Strategy Consulting →